Gambling Limits NZ Players
Gambling limits are one of the most practical harm-reduction tools available to New Zealand players. They are not designed to make gambling risk-free, and they do not change the mathematical structure of casino games. Their purpose is simpler and more useful: to stop gambling from expanding beyond money, time, and emotional boundaries that a person has set in advance.
In New Zealand, gambling harm is treated as a serious public health issue. The Ministry of Health states that gambling harm can negatively affect individuals, whānau, and communities, and that about one in five people in New Zealand will experience harm in their lifetime from their own or someone else’s gambling. The Department of Internal Affairs also explains that New Zealand’s Gambling Act and harm-minimisation regulations include measures intended to limit gambling harm from pokies and casino gambling.
For players, this means limits should not be viewed as optional extras hidden in an account menu. They are core safety tools. A player who sets limits before gambling begins has a better chance of avoiding impulsive deposits, extended sessions, chasing losses, and emotional play. A player who waits until after a bad session may already be making decisions under pressure.
What Gambling Limits Mean for NZ Players
Gambling limits are pre-set controls that restrict how much money or time a person can spend gambling. They may include deposit limits, loss limits, wagering limits, session limits, time-outs, cooling-off periods, and self-exclusion. Some limits are built into gambling platforms. Others must be created personally, through banking tools, device controls, budgeting habits, or support services.
The strongest limits are set before the first deposit. This matters because gambling decisions change once money is already in play. A person may begin calmly, lose more quickly than expected, and then feel pressure to continue. At that point, the original plan becomes harder to follow. A limit works best when it is already active and cannot easily be changed in the middle of a session.
A gambling limit should also be realistic. If losing the full limit would create stress, the limit is too high. The safest gambling budget is money that can be lost without affecting rent, food, bills, transport, study, family obligations, debt payments, or savings. If the money is needed for real life, it should not be placed at risk.
A useful rule for NZ players is to treat gambling as a fixed entertainment expense, not a flexible spending category. A cinema ticket, concert ticket, or subscription has a defined cost. Gambling should be treated even more strictly because the cost can expand quickly if no limit is in place.
| Limit Type | What It Controls | Why It Matters | Practical NZ Player Rule |
| Deposit Limit | How much money can be added to an account | Stops repeated deposits after losses | Set it before playing and keep it below spare entertainment money |
| Loss Limit | How much can be lost during a period | Prevents losses from exceeding the planned boundary | Use a lower limit than the maximum amount you can technically afford |
| Session Limit | How long one gambling session can last | Reduces time distortion during repeated play | Set a timer before starting and stop when it ends |
| Wager Limit | Maximum stake size per bet or round | Prevents emotional stake increases | Never raise stake size to recover a loss |
| Time-Out | Temporary account or activity break | Interrupts risky behaviour after stress or chasing | Use immediately after a session feels difficult to control |
| Self-Exclusion | Longer restriction from gambling access | Creates a stronger barrier when limits are not enough | Use when gambling becomes secretive, harmful, or hard to stop |
Why Deposit Limits Should Come First
Deposit limits are usually the first line of protection because deposits create gambling exposure. A person cannot lose money that never enters the gambling account. This makes deposit limits more useful than win goals. A win goal depends on uncertain results. A deposit limit depends on a decision the player can control.
Many gambling problems begin with repeated small deposits rather than one large deposit. A person may tell themselves that each deposit is minor, but the total over a week or month becomes serious. This is why the time period matters. A $20 deposit limit means different things if it applies daily, weekly, or monthly.
For NZ players, the safer approach is to set a monthly gambling budget first, then divide it into smaller limits. If the monthly amount is $100, that does not mean the player should deposit $100 in one session. It may mean four smaller limits across the month or, in some cases, choosing not to gamble at all.
The Login area of any gambling account should be treated as a control point, not only an entry point. Before entering any lobby, the player should check whether deposit limits are active, whether previous limits were followed, and whether there is any emotional reason to avoid gambling that day.
Loss Limits and the Problem of Chasing
Loss limits are important because they respond to one of the most dangerous gambling behaviours: chasing losses. Chasing means continuing to gamble because money has already been lost. It often feels logical in the moment, but it turns gambling into a recovery attempt rather than entertainment.
A loss limit creates a hard stop. Once the limit is reached, the session ends. The player does not continue because the next spin, hand, or round “might fix it.” That thought is exactly why the limit exists.
Loss limits should be lower than the maximum amount a person can technically afford. If someone says they could “survive” losing $500, that does not mean $500 is a responsible limit. The limit should be based on comfort, not survival. If the amount would create regret, stress, secrecy, or pressure, it is too high.
A Bonus offer should never override a loss limit. Promotions can create the feeling that gambling is cheaper or safer, but wagering requirements, expiry rules, maximum bet conditions, and restricted games can extend play. If accepting an offer leads to more gambling than planned, the offer should be skipped.
Time Limits and Session Control
Time limits are as important as money limits. Online gambling can reduce natural stopping points. A person can move from one game to another, deposit quickly, and continue without leaving the room. This makes session length easy to underestimate.
A responsible session needs a defined end. “I will stop when I feel like it” is not a limit. Better rules include “I will stop after 30 minutes,” “I will stop when this timer ends,” or “I will stop after this fixed budget is used.” The rule should be decided before the session begins.
The Sign up stage should also include limit thinking. Before opening a new gambling account, a player should ask whether they are joining for entertainment or because they are trying to access more gambling opportunities. If the reason is to bypass previous limits, use another promotion, or restart after losses, registration should not continue.
Time limits are especially useful for mobile gambling. A phone can make gambling feel casual, but fast access increases risk. Players should avoid gambling during tired, stressed, isolated, or late-night periods because self-control is usually weaker then.
Applying Limits to Mobile Gambling, Fast Games and Player Budgets
Gambling limits work best when they match the way a person actually gambles. A player who mainly uses a phone needs mobile-access limits. A player who spends too long in fast games needs session and speed controls. A player who repeatedly deposits after losses needs deposit and payment limits. A player who increases stakes emotionally needs wager limits. The correct limit is not theoretical. It should respond to the real behaviour pattern.
For NZ players, this practical matching is important because gambling access can be constant. A person does not need to travel to a venue, wait for opening hours, or carry cash. Online gambling can happen from a sofa, bedroom, work break, bus ride, or late-night phone session. That convenience makes boundaries more important, not less.
Mobile Gambling Limits
Mobile gambling can feel casual because it happens on the same device used for ordinary life. The player may check messages, banking, social media, and then open a gambling site or app almost automatically. This creates a blurred boundary between everyday phone use and real-money risk.
If a player uses an App, the limit system should be stricter. The app should not be treated as harmless entertainment sitting on the phone. If gambling has become difficult to control, the safest step is to remove the app, disable notifications, block downloads where possible, and avoid saved payment details.
Mobile limits should include time boundaries. For example, a player may decide not to gamble after 9 p.m., not to gamble in bed, not to gamble during work or study breaks, and not to gamble when alone after stress. These rules are simple, but they reduce high-risk access.
Device friction also helps. Logging out after each session, removing shortcuts, clearing saved passwords, and using blocking tools can slow down impulsive behaviour. A limit is stronger when the device does not make gambling effortless.
Limits for Fast Games and Repetitive Play
Fast games require stronger boundaries because decisions happen quickly. The faster the game, the less time the player has to reflect between bets. This is why session limits and wager limits are essential for products that allow rapid repeated play.
The Slots category can be especially risky because spins are quick, features are visually engaging, and volatility can create long losing stretches followed by occasional wins. A player may keep spinning because a bonus round feels close, even though each result is controlled by game mechanics and uncertainty.
For fast games, a responsible limit should include stake size, session time, and total loss amount. A small stake is not automatically safe if the game pace is high. A player placing many small bets quickly can lose more than expected. The useful question is not only “How much is one bet?” but “How much can this session cost if I keep playing at this speed?”
Autoplay or quick-play features should be used cautiously or avoided entirely by players who struggle with control. These features reduce decision points, and decision points are where stopping can happen. The fewer pauses a session has, the easier it is to continue beyond the planned limit.
| Gambling Pattern | Main Risk | Best Limit to Use | Practical Rule |
| Mobile late-night play | Fatigue reduces control and sessions extend quietly | Time limit and device block | No gambling after a fixed evening cut-off time |
| Fast slots | Many bets can happen in a short period | Session limit, stake limit and loss limit | Calculate risk by session cost, not by one spin |
| Repeated deposits | Small amounts accumulate into larger losses | Daily, weekly or monthly deposit limit | One deposit per planned period, no top-ups after losses |
| Emotional stake increases | Bet size rises after frustration or chasing | Wager limit | Never increase the stake to recover money |
| Bonus-driven play | Promotions extend sessions or increase deposits | Bonus refusal rule and budget cap | Skip any offer that changes the original plan |
| Game switching | Moving between games feels like control but extends play | Total session time limit | The timer applies to the whole session, not each game |
Budget Limits and Real Affordability
A gambling budget should be built from real affordability, not from hope. The player should not ask, “How much could I win?” or “How much do I need to recover?” The correct question is: “How much can I lose without affecting my life?”
A responsible budget excludes essential money. It should not include rent, groceries, transport, bills, school costs, family money, debt payments, savings, or emergency funds. If gambling money competes with any of those categories, the person should not gamble.
Budget limits should also include a cooling rule. If the monthly budget is used early, the player should not reset it because there is still time left in the month. The limit belongs to the period. Once it is used, gambling stops until the next planned period.
Some players benefit from a written gambling budget. This can be a note, spreadsheet, banking category, or simple monthly record. The purpose is visibility. Gambling harm often grows when small transactions disappear into ordinary spending. Written tracking makes the real total harder to ignore.
Payment Limits and Banking Friction
Payment access is a major part of gambling control. Even strong intentions can weaken if deposits are instant and saved payment methods are ready. A player who wants safer limits should review the payment route, not only the gambling account.
Useful barriers include removing saved cards, disabling one-click deposits, reducing card limits, using transaction alerts, separating essential funds, and asking a bank about gambling-related controls where available. These steps are especially important for people who deposit impulsively after losses.
A payment limit should protect the player from the most emotional version of themselves. It is easy to make responsible decisions while calm. The real test is what happens after a bad session. Payment friction creates time between the urge and the deposit.
If a player repeatedly finds ways around payment barriers, that is a sign that ordinary limits may not be enough. Stronger options such as self-exclusion, blocking tools and professional support should be considered.
Limits Across the Whole Games Lobby
A large Games lobby can make gambling feel like browsing rather than betting. The player may move from one category to another, looking for a better result. This can feel strategic, but it often extends the session.
A responsible limit should cover the whole gambling session, not one game at a time. If the player sets a 40-minute limit, switching games does not restart the clock. If the player sets a $50 loss limit, moving to another game does not create a new budget.
This is especially important when players move from slower games into faster games after losses. The change can increase risk because the person may be trying to recover quickly. A responsible player should treat game switching after losses as a warning sign, not a strategy.
The safest approach is to choose the game type before the session begins and avoid changing categories emotionally. If the planned game stops feeling enjoyable, the session should end rather than shift into another risk pattern.
When Limits Should Become Breaks
Limits are useful only if they work. If a player repeatedly breaks them, argues with them, raises them after losses, or opens new accounts to avoid them, the problem is no longer the number chosen. The problem is that gambling has become difficult to control.
At that point, the player should move from limits to breaks. A time-out can help if the issue is temporary. Self-exclusion is more appropriate if the behaviour is repeated, secretive, financially harmful, or emotionally difficult to stop.
A useful rule is this: if the same limit is broken twice, stop and review the pattern before gambling again. If the same pattern continues, stronger barriers are needed. Limits are not meant to be decorative. They are there to stop harm.
Reviewing Gambling Behaviour and Knowing When Limits Are Failing
Gambling limits are only useful if they are reviewed honestly. A player can set deposit limits, loss limits, time limits and wager limits, but if those limits are repeatedly changed, ignored, bypassed or treated as obstacles, the system is not working. Limits are not there to create the appearance of control. They are there to protect money, time and wellbeing.
For NZ players, the most important review question is not “Did I win?” The better question is “Did I follow the plan?” A winning session can still be risky if the player broke limits, extended time, increased stakes emotionally or felt unable to stop. A losing session can be controlled if the player stopped exactly where planned. Responsible gambling is measured by behaviour, not by short-term outcome.
Why Session Review Matters
A session review should happen after gambling ends, not during emotional play. It does not need to be complicated. A player can ask five direct questions: Did I stay within my deposit limit? Did I stop on time? Did I chase losses? Did I increase stakes emotionally? Did I feel calm after the session?
If the answer is repeatedly negative, the limit structure needs to change. A player who keeps going beyond time limits may need stronger session restrictions or device blocks. A player who repeatedly deposits after losses may need lower deposit limits, payment friction or self-exclusion. A player who feels shame after gambling may need a longer break and support.
A review also helps identify patterns. Some players break limits at night. Others break them after payday, stress, alcohol, boredom, sport events or promotional messages. Once the pattern is visible, the protection can be placed at the correct point.
The goal is not self-criticism. The goal is practical information. A gambling record should not become a reason for shame. It should become a map showing where limits are too weak.
| Review Question | Healthy Signal | Warning Signal | Next Step |
| Did I stay within my deposit limit? | The planned amount was enough and no extra deposit was made | The limit was raised, bypassed or followed by another account | Lower the limit, add payment controls or pause gambling |
| Did I stop on time? | The session ended when the timer or rule said it should | The session continued because the result felt unfinished | Use stricter session tools or stop gambling for a set period |
| Did I chase losses? | Losses were accepted as the cost of entertainment | More money was added to recover what was lost | Use a time-out or seek support before gambling again |
| Did I increase stakes emotionally? | Bet size stayed within the original plan | Stake size rose after frustration, boredom or impatience | Set a wager limit or avoid fast games |
| Did gambling affect my mood? | The session ended without stress, secrecy or regret | The player felt anxious, ashamed, angry or restless | Take a break and consider support tools |
When Limits Are No Longer Enough
Limits are not always sufficient. If a person keeps breaking them, the problem is not the specific number. The issue is that gambling has become difficult to control. In that situation, stronger protection is needed.
Warning signs include repeated top-up deposits, changing limits immediately after losses, opening new accounts, using different payment methods to continue, hiding activity, borrowing money, or gambling after deciding to stop. These behaviours show that the limit system has been weakened by the urge to continue.
When this happens, the next step should be a break. A short time-out may help if the pattern is recent and mild. Self-exclusion is more suitable if the behaviour is repeated, harmful, secretive or emotionally intense. The player should not wait until the situation becomes severe.
A useful rule is: if gambling requires negotiation with your own limits, stop. Limits should not be debated during a session. They should be fixed before the session begins.
Using Whānau or Trusted Support
Some players can manage limits privately. Others benefit from involving someone they trust. This could be a partner, family member, friend, counsellor or gambling support worker. Support can help because gambling harm often grows in secrecy.
A trusted person does not need access to every account detail. They can help in simple ways: checking in before high-risk periods, helping set device blocks, supporting a time-out request, helping protect essential money, or encouraging contact with a support service.
The conversation should be direct but calm. A player might say: “I am setting gambling limits because I do not want this to become harmful. Can you help me check that I stick to them?” If harm has already appeared, the wording should be stronger: “I have been breaking my gambling limits and I need help putting barriers in place.”
Whānau support should not become surveillance or shame. The goal is structure. The player needs help staying aligned with the plan, not punishment.
Limits and Gambling Support Services
If limits are repeatedly failing, support services can help the player move from vague control attempts to a practical harm-reduction plan. Support may include counselling, budgeting guidance, self-exclusion help, trigger mapping, relapse planning and family support.
A player does not need to wait for severe debt or crisis before contacting support. If gambling causes stress, secrecy, arguments, broken limits or repeated chasing, help is already appropriate. Early support can prevent a more serious pattern.
Support services can also help identify whether the player should continue with ordinary limits or move to stronger tools. In some cases, deposit limits and session reminders may be enough. In other cases, self-exclusion and payment blocks are safer.
The FAQ section of any gambling platform should explain limits clearly, but platform information is not a substitute for independent support if harm is already present. Operator tools can help, but external guidance may be needed when the person cannot follow the tools alone.
How Promotions Can Weaken Limits
Promotions can interfere with gambling limits because they create a reason to continue. A player may set a budget, then receive an offer that appears to add value. The offer may say that a deposit match, free spins, cashback or loyalty reward is available for a limited time. This can make the player feel that skipping it means losing an opportunity.
For safer gambling, the budget must come first. If a promotion would require a deposit outside the plan, the promotion should be ignored. If wagering rules require extended play beyond the time limit, the promotion should be skipped. If a reward encourages switching games or raising stakes, it is not compatible with responsible limits.
Players should also avoid treating bonus funds as risk-free. Bonus play can still extend time, increase emotional involvement and create frustration when terms are not met. The safer question is not “Is this offer good?” but “Does this offer fit inside my existing limit structure?”
If the answer is no, the offer should not be used.
Building a Monthly Limit Review
A monthly review is useful because gambling harm can build through repeated small decisions. A single session may look harmless, but a month of repeated deposits, late-night sessions or broken limits can show a different picture.
A monthly review should include total deposits, total withdrawals, net spend, number of sessions, longest session, number of times limits were changed, number of times extra deposits were made, and emotional impact. The emotional part matters because money alone does not show the full picture.
If the monthly review shows stress, secrecy or repeated rule-breaking, the next month should not continue the same way. The player should reduce limits, take a break, add blocking tools or contact support.
A good monthly review also includes a positive question: What worked? Maybe a lower deposit limit helped. Maybe a timer stopped long sessions. Maybe removing an app reduced urges. Those working tools should stay in place.
Long-Term Habits for Safer Limits
Long-term limit control depends on consistency. A player should avoid changing limits during emotional periods. Limit increases should never happen immediately after a loss. If a platform allows limit increases only after a delay, the player should treat that delay as useful protection, not an inconvenience.
Players should also avoid gambling when tired, stressed, intoxicated, angry, lonely or under financial pressure. Limits are weaker when the person is not in a stable state. Even a good limit system can fail if the player starts from a risky emotional position.
Another useful habit is to keep gambling separate from everyday phone use. Do not gamble during work breaks, study breaks, family time, or while multitasking. Gambling should never become background activity. If it happens at all, it should be planned, limited and easy to stop.
Players should also avoid using gambling as a reward after stress. This can create a habit loop. A safer reward should not involve financial risk.
Complete Gambling Limits Checklist for NZ Players
Gambling limits work best when they are simple, visible and difficult to change during emotional moments. A player does not need a complicated system. The strongest structure usually combines five basic controls: a deposit limit, a loss limit, a session limit, a wager limit and a break rule. If those controls are not enough, time-out or self-exclusion should become the next step.
For New Zealand players, the main goal is to keep gambling separate from essential life needs. Gambling should not affect rent, food, bills, transport, study, family obligations, debt payments, savings or emotional stability. If gambling starts touching those areas, ordinary limits may no longer be enough.
Daily, Weekly and Monthly Gambling Limits
A complete limit system should include different time periods. A daily limit prevents one session from expanding too far. A weekly limit prevents repeated small deposits from accumulating. A monthly limit shows the real cost of gambling over time.
Daily limits are useful for session control. They stop the player from adding money repeatedly in one sitting. Weekly limits are useful for routine control. They prevent gambling from becoming too frequent. Monthly limits are useful for financial awareness because they show whether gambling still fits inside the person’s entertainment budget.
The monthly limit should be set first. Then the player can divide that amount into smaller weekly or session limits. This prevents the common problem of treating every session as separate. Gambling harm often grows because each session is mentally isolated from the last one. A monthly view makes the total visible.
| Limit Period | What It Controls | Best Use | Warning Sign |
| Daily Limit | Money or time spent in one day | Prevents one session from escalating | The player tries to continue after the daily limit is reached |
| Weekly Limit | Total gambling activity across several days | Controls repeated small deposits | The player treats each deposit as separate and ignores the total |
| Monthly Limit | Overall gambling cost across the month | Shows whether gambling fits the entertainment budget | The player uses essential money before the month ends |
| Session Limit | Length and structure of one gambling session | Reduces time distortion and repeated play | The player keeps switching games to extend time |
| Break Rule | When the player must stop gambling entirely | Protects against emotional or harmful play | The player negotiates with the rule after losing |
Pre-Session Checklist
Before gambling starts, the player should answer a few direct questions. Can I afford to lose this amount without stress? Have I set a time limit? Am I calm? Am I trying to recover money? Have I read the rules? Have I already gambled this week? If the answers are unclear, the session should not begin.
A responsible gambling session should never start from financial pressure. If the player needs money, gambling is the wrong activity. It should also never start from emotional pressure. If the player is angry, lonely, anxious, tired or ashamed, the safest decision is to delay.
The player should also decide the exit point before play starts. The exit point can be a time limit, a loss limit, a number of rounds, or a mood signal. For example, “I stop after 30 minutes,” “I stop after this deposit,” or “I stop if I feel frustrated.” These rules are strongest when written down or built into account tools.
If a player cannot define the exit point clearly, the session should not begin. Gambling without a stop rule is a high-risk pattern.
When to Lower Limits
Limits should be lowered if gambling starts to feel less controlled. Warning signs include repeated extra deposits, longer sessions, emotional stake increases, secrecy, arguments about gambling, or regret after play. The player should not wait for a major loss before adjusting limits.
A limit should also be lowered after any session that creates stress. The result of the session is not the only factor. Even a winning session can create risky confidence if the player feels encouraged to gamble more often. A lower limit after emotional gambling is a protective response.
If the player keeps raising limits after losses, that is a serious warning sign. Limit increases should never be made in response to frustration or chasing. In many cases, a cooling-off period should be used before any increase is allowed.
The safest rule is this: limits can be reduced immediately, but increases should be delayed, questioned and avoided if there has been recent harm.
When Limits Should Turn Into Time-Outs
A time-out is useful when gambling behaviour has become unstable but the person may not yet need long-term exclusion. It creates a temporary break and interrupts the cycle. NZ players should consider a time-out after chasing losses, gambling longer than planned, feeling unable to stop, or gambling after stress.
A time-out can last for a short period or longer, depending on the platform or personal tool used. The exact length matters less than the purpose. The purpose is to stop access long enough for emotion to cool and behaviour to be reviewed.
During the time-out, the player should not search for other gambling sites, open new accounts, or look for promotions. That would defeat the purpose. The break should be used to review spending, remove triggers, talk to support if needed, and decide whether stronger barriers are necessary.
If the player returns immediately after the time-out and repeats the same behaviour, self-exclusion should be considered.
When Self-Exclusion Is the Safer Choice
Self-exclusion is more appropriate when ordinary limits are repeatedly failing. If a player cannot stop after reaching a limit, hides gambling, borrows money, opens new accounts, uses essential funds, or keeps chasing losses, the issue has moved beyond normal limit-setting.
Self-exclusion should not be seen as extreme. It is a practical tool for situations where access itself has become risky. It removes or reduces the need to make repeated decisions under pressure.
The player should request exclusion clearly and save proof. The message should state that gambling is causing harm and that the account should be restricted or closed under responsible gambling rules. Marketing removal should also be requested so promotional messages do not trigger a return.
If self-exclusion feels difficult to start, a gambling support service or trusted person can help with the process.
Platform Signals That Support Safer Limits
A stronger gambling platform makes limits easy to find and easy to use. The account area should show deposit limits, session reminders, time-outs, self-exclusion tools, transaction history and responsible gambling information. The language should be clear, not hidden behind legal wording.
A weaker platform makes limits difficult to locate, pushes promotions aggressively, hides transaction history, or makes account closure complicated. These are poor signals for responsible gambling. Even if the player is personally disciplined, platform design can influence behaviour.
Players should also look at whether limit reductions apply quickly and whether increases require a delay. Immediate limit increases can be risky because they allow emotional decisions to take effect too fast. A delay gives the player time to reconsider.
Support Links should also be visible. A gambling site should not only provide games and payments; it should also direct players toward help, responsible gambling resources and exclusion tools when needed.
Final Safer-Gambling Guidance for NZ Players
Gambling limits are not about reducing enjoyment. They are about protecting control. A player who sets limits early is making gambling less likely to affect money, time, mood and relationships. The best limits are active before play begins, reviewed after play ends, and strengthened whenever warning signs appear.
For NZ players, the safest system is clear: set a monthly budget first, divide it into smaller limits, use deposit and loss limits, add session timers, avoid emotional gambling, skip promotions that change the plan, and stop when the limit is reached. If the same limits are broken repeatedly, stop gambling and use stronger tools.
Gambling should never require secrecy, borrowing, chasing, or negotiation with essential money. If it does, the correct response is not a better strategy. It is a break, support, and stronger protection.
A practical final rule is useful: if a limit protects you, keep it; if a limit fails twice, strengthen it; if gambling keeps breaking through the system, stop access completely and ask for help. That is the point of gambling limits for NZ players — not to make risk disappear, but to stop risk from taking over.
Comments